Verizon Comunication Inc Research Proposal Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Verizon Comunication Inc - Research Proposal Example Though as indicated by the RSI (Relative quality Index) the organization share was over purchased on first April 2008 and subsequently to keep up it ordinary level the offer cost descended. Central: The Verizon Communication value share tumbled somewhere around 23 penny to drop down at a degree of US$35.73. The explanation for this descending development is the speculator worry over income of the media transmission organizations just as the soaring oil costs. Specialized: The offer fall because of remedy in the market and it dropped to its help level of 10-day moving normal. Additionally as should be obvious from the chart at (www.finance.yahoo.com) the multi day moving normal simply chop down the 50 days moving normal on 17 April, 2008 and constrained the offer cost to descend as needs be. Crucial: The Verizon Communication share cost hopped 26 penny to the degree of US$38.21. The purpose for this bounce is the strong gaining from the organization for the main quarter, this strong procuring control the financial specialist stresses towards hindering economy. Specialized: If we take a gander at the diagram we would have the option to discover that the 10 days moving normal crossed the 50 ay moving normal upward way which is an indication of bullish example for the offer. Likewise the higher volume on 28th April, 2008 pushed the offer cost up on 29th. Crucial: The Verizon Communication share cost dropped somewhere near 1 penny. The purpose for this drop is the poor show by telecom organizations, the quarterly winning of some minimal effort remote transporter seen as a failure from the speculator and came about into 1 penny down for the

Requisitos de la carta de solicitud de asilo en EE.UU.

Requisitos de la carta de solicitud de asilo en EE.UU. La carta de declaraciã ³n individual del solicitante de asilo afirmativo risk el Servicio de Inmigraciã ³n y Ciudadanã ­a (USCIS, por sus siglas en inglã ©s) o del asilo defensivo en corte es una parte essential de la solicitud, ya que contribuye a demostrar que merece que se le reconozca en Estados Unidos la condiciã ³n de asilado. En este artã ­culo se explica en quã © momento debe enviarse dicha carta y quã © elementos debe contener en su redacciã ³n.  ¿Cundo debe enviarse la carta deâ declaraciã ³n individual en la peticiã ³n de asilo? Esta carta forma parte del paquete con el que se solicita al USCIS o a la corte que reconozca una situaciã ³n de asilo. En otras palabras, es uno de los documentos que se envã ­an junto con la planilla I-589 y que inicia el proceso. Dicha planilla debe acompaã ±arse por una serie de documentos de apoyo, entre ellos, laâ declaraciã ³n individual del solicitante de asilo en forma de carta. Requisitos de la carta de declaraciã ³n individual para solicitarâ asilo en EE.UU. Esta carta se escribe habitualmente en una o varias pginas, las cuales se adjuntan a la planilla I-589â porque el espacio en esta no suele ser suficiente. Es crucial que la carta resulte creã ­ble al oficial del USCIS o al juez de corte migratoria y para ello es necesario que la declaraciã ³n que contiene ocean consistente con todo lo que previamente se ha dicho o posteriormente se alegue. No debe haber discrepancias grandes, porque darã ­a pie a pensar que se est mintiendo y, por lo tanto, se negarã ­a la peticiã ³n de asilo. Entre otros elementos, la carta de declaraciã ³n debe contener una explicaciã ³n de por quã © el solicitante de asilo ha dejado su paã ­s y por quã © tiene miedo de regresar.â Adems, debe incluir la redacciã ³n de incidentes sufridos por razã ³n de religiã ³n, raza, nacionalidad, opiniã ³n polã ­tica o pertenencia an un grupo social,â incluyendo todos los detalles que se recuerden. No es necesario especificar fechas exactas, pero sã ­, al menos, una cronologã ­a aproximada. Tambiã ©n debe incluirse una descripciã ³n de situaciones de persecuciã ³n sufridas por el mismo motivo por familiares o amigos. Finalmente, si el solicitante de asilo sospecha que su peticiã ³n puede ser negada porque el gobierno puede creer que le aplica alguna de las prohibiciones legales para obtener dicho beneficio, deber incluir en esta carta una explicaciã ³n de las razones por las que dicha prohibiciã ³n no le aplica. Por ejemplo, es relativamente comã ºn que el gobierno niegue el asilo alegando que el solicitante se ha establecido previamente de manera fija en un tercer paã ­s. Si eso no es asã ­, deber aclararse este punto. Documentaciã ³n de apoyo Una vez que se tiene la carta escrita debe buscarse otra documentaciã ³n que sirva para corroborar razonablemente las condiciones que se describen sobre el paã ­s del que se huye y los hechos especã ­ficos que se alegan que leâ han sucedido a la persona que pide el asilo.â Para ello pueden utilizarse recortes de periã ³dicos, declaraciones juradas de expertos y testigos, rã ©cords mã ©dicos o psicolã ³gicos, fotografã ­as que demuestren golpes, diarios personales, documentos oficiales como rã ©cords de detenciones, cualquier documentoâ con amenazas, carnets de pertenencia an un determinado partido polã ­tico,â declaraciones personales del solicitante de asilo en forma de carta, and so on. En realidad, se puede presentar cualquier prueba que sirva para demostrar lo que se afirma en la carta de declaraciã ³n individual, pero siempre tiene que ser pertinente y relevante.â Tener en cuenta que el gobierno de Estados Unidos es muy consciente de que determinados documentos del paã ­s de origen del solicitante de asilo no es posible obtenerlos. En estos casos es suficiente explicar que se ha intentado pero no ha sido posible. Lo que nunca debe hacerse es presentar documentaciã ³n falsa. Idioma de la carta de declaraciã ³n y documentos adicionales El solicitante de asilo puede escribir la carta de declaraciã ³n en el idioma en que mejor pueda explicarse. La carta y todos los documentos que se adjunta en apoyo de la misma deben estar traducidos al inglã ©s, si es que estn redactados en otro idioma.â Para ello, no es necesario pagar los servicios de un traductor jurado, siendo suficiente que traduzca toda la documentaciã ³n una persona con conocimientos fluidos de espaã ±ol e inglã ©s y que certifique la traducciã ³n adecuadamente. Adems, es recomendable no adjuntar ningã ºn documento oficial, como por ejemplo un carnet de identificaciã ³n, una carta emitida por otro gobierno, and so on y sã ­ enviar en su lugar una copia readable del mismo. El dã ­a de la entrevista con el oficial del USCIS o de presentaciã ³n en Corte migratoria se deben llevar esos documentos originales para que se puedan cotejar con las copias que previamente se enviaron. Si se envã ­an los originales lo que probablemente suceda es que nunca podrn recuperarse, de ahã ­ que se envã ­an solo fotocopias. La importancia imperative de contar con un abogado migratorio para casos de asilo En los à ºltimos aã ±os ha habido un fuerte incremento de peticiones de asilo en Estados Unidos por parte de ciudadanos de Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mã ©xico y Venezuela, peroâ la mayorã ­a de dichas peticiones child negadas, particularmente las que se intentan protector sin abogado. Por ejemplo, en el caso de asilo afirmativo, solo un 1,5% de los casos de mujeres y niã ±os centroamericanos que se presentan sin abogado a la entrevista de miedo creã ­ble logran aprobarla. Por otro lado, los abogados migratorios estn teniendo à ©xito presentando los casos en cortes receptivas. Por ejemplo, mientras que en Georgia se niegan un 90% de los casos, en Nueva York se aprueban el 75%.â Asimismo, los letrados estn siendo exitosos a la hora de convencer an un buen nã ºmero de jueces de que las amenazas y los daã ±os perpetrados contra mujeres y niã ±os por pandilleros encajan en los casos de persecuciã ³n por pertenecer an un grupo social y, por lo tanto, ameritan la consideraciã ³n de asilo. La presencia de un abogado en un caso de asilo es altamente recomendable desde el comienzo, contando con su asesoramiento en la redacciã ³n de la carta de declaraciã ³n de peticiã ³n de asilo ya que esta determina la razã ³n por la que se hace la solicitud y posteriormente no se puede cambiar su esencia ni contradecir su esencia. Si no se puede pagar an un abogado, se recomienda contactar con alguna organizaciã ³n de apoyo legitimate an inmigrantes con buena reputaciã ³n en la defensa de este tipo de casos. Este es un artã ­culo informativo. No es asesorã ­a legitimate.

Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 4

Morals - Essay Example A third arrangement of morals is simply the deontological hypothesis that lays accentuation on self-rule, demonstrations of thoughtfulness, and all inclusive equity. The fourth moral hypothesis is the ethicalness morals. This hypothesis fights that ethics exist inside, laying more accentuation on the creation of people who act morally in light of the fact that they are normally acceptable individuals. Utilitarianism is the fifth generally acknowledged arrangement of morals. As per this hypothesis, utilitarianism as a hypothesis of morals battles that activities should be considered as off-base or right with respect to the outcomes that the activities have. The hypothesis makes a contention that great activities are those that give extraordinary bliss to whatever number people as could reasonably be expected (Wundt, 2010). Regardless of the way that utilitarianism as a moral hypothesis has come in for some analysis, particularly from the philosophical side, the hypothesis is the most persuading of the various referenced moral frameworks. Utilitarian Ethical System Utilitarianism as a moral hypothesis can be dated as far back as the seventeenth century. The hypothesis is ascribed to Thomas Hobbes, who was an antiquated understudy of theory before it was evaluated Bentham in the eighteenth century and Stuart Mill audited it later (Ekland-Olson and Dirks, 2011). Stuart plant is viewed as the utilitarian theory’s father with explore indicating that, following his audit of the hypothesis, the hypothesis turned out to be a piece of present day thought. Numerous individuals see the hypothesis as a suitable option in contrast to the more acknowledged Christianity. The explanation that it is the most persuading of the various moral hypotheses is on the grounds that it will in general make a judgment on a go about as either off-base or right contingent upon the act’s result (Ekland-Olson and Dirks, 2011). The ramifications of this is, the utilitarian hypothe sis empowers individuals to consider what result the demonstration has before they choose for seek after an approach or activity over different choices that are accessible to them. At the point when an individual thinks about the results of their individual activities, the hypothesis permits them to consider other persons’ interests, as opposed to simply their very own advantages. This is exceptionally persuading when considered as a moral framework. Morals includes making the right decision with respect to the enthusiasm of others as opposed to doing it to suit one’s own advantages. Hence, obviously the utilitarian moral framework is centered around the production of a more joyful presence for whatever number people in the general public as could be allowed (Ekland-Olson and Dirks, 2011). This factor makes the hypothesis more persuading than others do. Utilitarianism is additionally made all the more persuading as an arrangement of morals by one more factor that is it s practicability and sanity. The utilitarianism morals have their premise on a reasonable computation on what number of people can have their bliss and fulfillment boosted by the activities faced and their results (Smart, 2011). This is basic and clear, and through the utilization of utilitarianism as a basic standard for the judgment of what's going on and what is correct, it stays away from the tainting of the lesson of ethical quality with discernments that are unreasonable, emotions, just as biases. The most fundamental factor that passes on the profoundly persuading status to this specific arrangement of morals is the way that there is common sense in the objective calculation rule (Smart, 2011). As a moral framework, the utilitarian t

Tom Regan’s Animal Rights, Human Wrongs

Basic entitlements, or the foundation and the possibility of them being legitimate, have become an inexorably fascinating debate for a long while. The point appears to scrutinize the regular profound quality and morals of man, while all the while addressing rehearses that target humanity’s wellbeing, extravagance, and at times, endurance. In such a discussion, three articles come to mind.The discussing articles: â€Å"Cow VS Animal Rights†, â€Å"Animal Rights, Human Wrongs†, and â€Å"Proud to be a Speciesist† all convey a solid contention to the subject, yet making it very hard to touch off a strong arrangement around the theme, being that each article is detailed and intensive in contending their point. In â€Å"Animal Rights, Human Wrongs†, the possibility of basic entitlements is straightforwardly and altogether supported.Written by Tom Regan, the article presents a few instances of creature mercilessness in an apparently endeavor to place the peruser in an equal viewpoint of every creature in endeavor to make the peruser feel grieved or some type of compassion toward every casualty. Regan challenges the techniques for chasing, modern shaping, and logical practices on creatures, and, utilizing his pity-the-casualty system, encourages the acknowledgment of the privileges of creatures as a gathering that stands one next to the other with the people in issues relating lawful rights.In Stephen Rose’s article â€Å"Proud to be a Speciesist†, this idea is negated straightforwardly. Stephen Rose gives a totally alternate point of view and thought on the matter of basic entitlements. In the article, Rose proposes a circumstance where the rights, if any exist whatsoever, of mosquitoes and different vermin are abused once they’re eradicated by human decision. This circumstance gives an equitable contention, being that such nuisances are killed constantly, yet, in the event that they were ever to accomplish such rights, concerns scrutinizing their reality would emerge and put a muddled turn on the rudiments of life itself.In â€Å"Cow VS Animal Rights Activist†, composed by Linda Hasselstrom, an alternate view is misused. The article holds a nonpartisan point of view, being that the author clarifies the employments of creatures (fundamentally dairy animals) however doesn't shun educating the peruser regarding all the bovine suffers while under human use. All things being equal, Regan utilizes sentiment while showing each animal’s downfall to persuade the peruser to have a similar view, or â€Å"ideal†, in the issues concerning creature rights.In every circumstance, he gives a casualty, depicting every one as honest and powerless, and afterward he gives the portrayal of their passing. He paints inconceivably striking photos of the circumstance by expounding on what might probably be the last minutes every creature experienced before their demise. Rose, then again, utili zes a frail type of consciences in his composition. Contending exclusively from his situation as an analyst, Rose has diminish validity and the greater part of his contentions are one-sided from the point of view of a researcher.This is made evident when he attempts to legitimize creature examine by asserting that it has brought about numerous solutions for ailments human experience today. Hasselstrom’s type of logos adds to her contention in an apparently corresponding manner. From her point of view, she basically expresses the upsides and downsides of farming and chasing, too reveal the hardships looked by farmers that numerous activists appear to ignore. With these contentions at point, the issues of basic entitlements will stay a discussion as long as the ethics and morals of the basic man have an influence in its choice.